GO TO THE FOLLOWING URL for an alternative view about the WORLD TRADE CENTER DEMOLITION:
Poll - Most Americans Believe 911
Was
Homegrown/NWO Operation
Ecclesiastic Commonwealth Community
www.ecclesia.org
7-7-2
Poll Question:
More than six months has passed since the 9-11 disaster.
Who do you honestly believe actually caused and was the major force behind the
destruction of the World Trade Center?
Results: 5682 votes counted as of 7-7-02
Osama bin Laden (4.4 %) 250 votes
American militias (0.3 %) 18 votes
The White House (21.9 %) 1243 votes
The Pentagon (1.1 %) 65 votes
The Taliban / al-Qaida (18.2 %) 1035 votes
Sadaam Hussein (Iraq) (3.9 %) 224 votes
The New World Order (48.0 %) 2728 votes
Other (2.1 %) 119 votes
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=97&pollresults=1
Email This Article
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
It is a interesting article by Kevin Dowling & Phillip Knightley about a comprehensive look at 9/11 in relation to the OIL MOTIVATION of ~ perhaps ~ very 'slick' characters. There are also very interesting links throughout the article.
OPIUM WEB & THE JFK ASSASSINATION: GOTO >>>
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=19514
FOR AN ASTOUNDING THEORY ABOUT THE NEFARIOUS INTRIGUE SURROUNDING THE ASSASSINATION OF KENNEDY; this was put together by an amateur historian who spent many years piecing together the possible plot~+_+~[TALK ABOUT YOUR DRUG LORDS WHO DECIDE WHO IS TO LIVE AND WHO IS TO DIE-AND ALL FOR GREED in the wonderful Kingdom of Man~+_+~]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Below is the last "summary" portion of a comprehensive essay by Chaim Kupferberg, called, "The Mystery surrounding the death of John O"Neill: THE PROPAGANDA PREPARATION FOR 9/11">>>>>>>>>THE LINK TO THE FULL ESSAY IS INDICATED ALSO BELOW. [My purpose, on this web page, is to present ALTERNATIVE MAINSTREAM INFORMATION, SO YOU, THE VIEWER, WILL BE IN POSSESSION OF SUGGESTED DATA TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION ABOUT THE WORLD WE INHABIT.] lebeau reporting~+_+~
So, to sum up, it appears that the events of September 11 were planned years in advance, with the groundwork
being carefully laid by a propaganda campaign orchestrated to convince the public that the United States has a
plausibly sophisticated nemesis with the motive, means, and opportunity to perpetrate a devastating act of terror
against Americans. Toward that end, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have been used as the primary proxy agents to
run a "false flag" operation, setting up and financing the infrastructure of al-Qaida in Afghanistan. Through
madrassas based in Pakistan, Saudi and Yemenite militants were instructed in the Saudi brand of Wahabbi Islam,
and subsequently "graduated" to the camps that were set up in Afghanistan - again, under Saudi and Pakistani
sponsorship. Stateside, the operative agents were mostly based out of New York City and Florida. In the
aftermath of 9/11, elements in the American government are now widely disseminating information in vast
quantities, overwhelming the populace and lending credibility to the government's version of events. Thus,
post-9/11, the actions of this formerly insular propaganda clique are no longer perceptible. Information is now
being doled out in generous portions to credulous reporters who are outside the loop, yet perform their unwitting
service as "bottoms feeders" in the downward flow of information.
In all cases, the actions of these proxy agents and operative planners are sufficiently distanced and
compartmentalized from the true masterminds to create a condition of "plausible deniability". In short, the proxies
have also been set up as possible patsies with evidence that has been carefully laid to incriminate them should
cracks in the "official story" become too discernible. Moreover, the groundwork has already been carefully laid to
cast aspersions on another convenient patsy - the Jews, by way of the State of Israel and its supporters. Already,
for those prone to perceive Jewish conspiracies, the reliable vein of anti-semitism - combined with anti-Zionism -
has been mined to distract the masses and to create a modern version of the ritual blood libel, thereby further
"muddying the waters" should the true masterminds be threatened with exposure. In other words, the present
difficulties in the Middle East work perfectly to set up the State of Israel as a plausible alternative suspect with
motive, means, and opportunity. Toward that end, a low-level "buzz" has been circulating over the Internet (and
especially in Europe) - fueled by a coy report from Fox News - of an Israeli spy ring that was rounded up in the
days after September 11. Whether or not these reports are credible is not the point. Most likely, there was a spy
ring operating, and various Israelis were unwittingly set up as patsies, to be exposed should the need arise. Thus,
while evidence may be marshalled to taint the Saudis, Pakistanis, and Israelis, the real guilt must inevitably lie with
those in the best position to manage the flow of information as well as reliably benefit from the new order created,
primarily, the political and corporate elites of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union -
also, as it happens, the very parties orchestrating the global war on terrorism. In this respect, the Saudis,
Pakistanis, or Israelis have far less to gain (other than the benefits of going along with the designs of the rich and
mighty).
I could go on and further highlight the obvious geostrategic gains of those who are clearly managing the flow of
information - the proverbial pipelines, oil, wealth, and so forth. But I think those purported benefits are a bit of a
"red herring" - more of a side benefit than the main motivating factor. It is no small act to intentionally take down
such an overarching symbol of financial stability as the Twin Towers, and chance killing thousands in the process.
Such a conspiracy, if in fact perpetrated from within, would by its nature necessitate a huge structural, cultural, and
demographic change. The very brazenness of the act, the naked aggression, would necessitate a tenacious
determination to achieve the ends for which these actions were perpetrated. There is no going back now. An
infrastructure is being laid out - one that will, finally, provide a dissident-proof totalitarian oligarchy composed of
like-minded elites served by an under-class kept under constant surveillance. The edifice of this regime is being
constructed, brick by brick, with the mortar of the Office of Homeland Security (to centralize and coordinate an
effective police state), the Freedom Corps (to indoctrinate the most idealist - and therefore activist - elements of
the populace toward service to the state), and the Patriot Act (to provide the legal basis for subverting long-held
rights under the screen of national security). If all of this sounds strangely familiar, if it is redolent of Huxley and
Orwell, that is perhaps because Huxley and Orwell were both intimately involved with the elites of their time - in
fact, were fully subsumed among them - in ways that made their future projections abundantly prescient, and, in
their minds, inevitable. With further refinements in mind control technologies - yes, they do exist - as well as the
monopolization of the food supply by way of sterile seed "terminator technology" - the approval for which was
granted in the months following 9/11 - the masses may be perpetually culled and exploited by those who hold the
keys to this fully managed society.
For such a plan to be effective, there is no need for all elements to be "in the loop." Many look upon the Council
On Foreign Relations (CFR) as one likely agent of a possible elitist conspiracy. Yet with a membership consisting
of thousands, it would be too unwieldly to manage such a group of individuals with such varying interests and
outlooks. In any case, that is not how the CFR is structured. Members of the CFR are invited into the ranks -
particularly where they have already achieved some measure of prominence in politics, finance, or the media. The
CFR, rather, exists as an organ to manage these "second-tier" elites - to ensure a consensus of sorts simply
through the technique of "mainstreaming" their thoughts and beliefs, as these are folk who are unduly preoccupied
with preserving their status in the ranking order. No need to "rock the boat" with foolish notions that could only
serve to discredit oneself in the eyes of one's peers. Standing over and above the CFR is a more manageable and,
on the whole, more powerful group of elites who do, in fact, perceive it as their duty and entitlement to determine
the mores and values, lifestyles and fate of the rest of us. Where the rank and file members of the CFR are largely
motivated by a self-interested careerism, these higher elites see it as their moral duty to guide the "ship of state", as
it were. To them, a unified world government is the most logical way to manage the affairs of the world. After all,
these global elites have more in common with one another than they do with the bulk of their respective
countrymen.
If this notion of reality strikes you as somewhat dissonant, at odds with your own personal experience, it may be
perhaps that we have not quite arrived there yet, and that you have personally not felt the corrosive lash of
political corruption and governmental malfeasance. In all likelihood, you have not read the mountain of evidence
detailing political and elite deviant behaviour in this country. You may even be dismissive of "conspiracies
theories", yet wholly unaware of the well-documented attempts by the CIA and FBI to subvert, surveill, and
propagandize the populace through programs such as Project Mockingbird (media infiltration) and MK-Ultra
(mind control through chemical, hypnotic, or electro-magnetic means). These programs are effected primarily
through "think tanks" that are set up across the United States for the purpose of disseminating information and
propaganda under the rubric of "expertise". Moreover, various foundations, such as the Rockefeller or Ford
Foundations, are often used as funnels to finance and feed the arteries of these propaganda networks. In the
1970's, a good deal of this structural corruption was officially exposed - in a "limited hang-out" - by way of the
Church Commission, as well as the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Thereafter, much of the most
damaging revelations were played down or ignored by the mainstream media, and the waters were then muddied
by a stream of outlandish conspiracy theories - aliens, Elvis, etc. - that merely served to discredit the information
that was most credible. "Muddying the waters", incidentally, is a tried and true staple of the intelligence craft.
It is really just a matter of familiarizing yourself with all the documented anomalies that do not accord with the
received, mainstream reality put forth to you by the mainstream media. As a practical guide to begin, you might
want to confine your search to strictly "mainstream" sources, as I have sought to do in attempting to construct my
case on 9/11. My evidence is by no means exhaustive. In fact, it is merely the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Yet
proceeding in this direction, under my hypothesis, has been most fruitful in analyzing the various anomalies that
pop up now and then.
Any simple keyword search of the following terms may be helpful in pointing toward a more substantive
understanding of the elites who ultimately guide your fortunes: "Iran-Contra" , "Mena", "BCCI", "Project
Paperclip", "Michael Aquino", "Paul Bonacci", "Operation Northwoods", "MK-Ultra". Much of the information on
these topics is credible and well-documented. More disturbingly, it highlights behaviour committed by the very
same elites who are now interpreting the events of 9/11 for you. Read for yourself, and decide, at the end of the
day, how much credibility you will continue to accord to those who claim to be the proper trustees of your fate
and well-being.
Chaim Kupferberg is a freelance researcher and writer. Copyright © Chaim Kupferberg 2002. Permission is granted to post this
text on non-commercial community internet sites, provided the source and the URL are indicated, the essay remains intact and
the copyright note is displayed.
The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP206A.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BELOW IS AN "EXCERPT" PLUS THE AUTHOR AND LINK TO FULL ESSAY FOR THOSE WHO ARE STILL PUZZLED BY THE EVENTS OF 9~11:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics at Canada's University of Ottawa, alleges that the ISI had links with the terrorist attacks and with the Bush administration. His work has become a favorite of conspiracy theorists, but may still warrant attention considering Chossudovsky's academic credentials.
http://www.iiie.net/Sept11/ISIRole.html#c >>>>>>>>"EXCERPT" FOPRM ABOVE ESSAY>>>>>>
Cover-up and Complicity?
The existence of an "ISI-Osama-Taliban axis" is a matter of public record. The links between the ISI and
agencies of the US government including the CIA are also a matter of public record.
Pakistan's ISI has been used by successive US adminstrations as "a go-between." Pakistan's
military-intelligence apparatus, constitutes the core institutional support to both Osama's Al Qaeda and the
Taliban. Without this institutional support, there would be no Taliban government in Kabul. In turn, without
the unbending support of the US government. there would be no powerful military-intelligence apparatus in
Pakistan.
Senior officials in the State Department were fully cognizant of General Mahmoud Ahmad's role. In the wake
of September 11, the Bush Administration consciously sought the "cooperation" of the ISI which had been
supporting and abetting Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.
In other words, the Bush Administration's relations with Pakistan's ISI --including its "consultations" with
General Mahmoud Ahmad in the week prior to September 11-- raise the issue of "cover-up" as well as
"complicity". While Ahmad was talking to US officials at the CIA and the Pentagon, the ISI allegedly had
contacts with the September 11 terrorists.
According to the Indian government intelligence report (referred to in the Times of India), the perpetrators of
the September 11 attacks had links to Pakistan's ISI, which in turn has links to agencies of the US
government. What this suggests is that key individuals within the US military-intelligence establishment might
have known about ISI contacts with the September 11 terrorist "ring-leader" Mohamed Atta and failed to
act.
Whether this amounts to the complicity of the Bush Administration remains to be firmly established. The least
one can expect at this stage is an inquiry. What is crystal clear, however, is that this war is not a "campaign
against international terrorism". It is a war of conquest with devastating consequences for the future of
humanity. And the American people have been consciously and deliberately misled by their government.
Ultimately the truth must prevail. The falsehoods behind America's war against the people of Afghanistan must
be unveiled.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>